Puddinger!
Dagbladet able today to make a kjempesak in size murders and other scandals over a kristiansand company has been a little bolder in their jobs. We will see some "dramatic" pictures of 2 men who work seemingly unaffected by the seemingly lethal workplace.
It must be allowed to ask whether we are about to go into a pudding society, where no one is allowed to do anything without getting any help tredd down huet. I've already been with me the trend in the U.S. with the help of the head when the kids climb in trees ... In the example taken up in Dabladet there are those employees who are putting themselves up for the fare, and so seen searching for Darwin awards. Why can not even consider their own work, whether it is concerned with securing them may actually require it or terminate the job.
How often is it really wrong when you go on a roof? Those people do not fall down from the roof, and people are often on the roof!
Work in the tender? Who pays for security?
As a self-employed, I am familiar with the price and demand. It is clear that stricter rules for security leads to higher costs and things take tengre time. This means that the final bill for the purchase is dyere. So then comes the question of claim, the contractor for the job, we see pictures from, it took them more tender? If it took the number of bids, this was a typical tender reasonable one that does not give room for security? It is clear to cut down on security and preparations will save many hours, and many hours can be distorted reasonable tender which gives you the job.
HSE is good, but some of us should be allowed to this from the ceiling and to - when you choose to take this chance! Let us be allowed to learn from their own stupid mistakes, the only way to learn anyway! We have only good to beat us a little now and then!
"Figures from the Labor Inspection shows that 49 people person died in accidents last year. There are 11 more than the year before. "Taken from the same article that you refer to.
If only 4 of these accidents occurred at the fall from the ceiling, it is 4 for a lot! To risking their own lives in the way that's dangerous NOK, and in this case illegal, but the risk that it will spread asbeststøv to the neighbors and the whole town is all the other case, too! Also for those who work with this may have successor by improper handling.
Rules are made to be followed, whether you want to or not. If they lost expected fines or other criminal consequences.
And what the U.S. trends affecting; There is a difference between imposed laws and over protective parents. Think it is biased in relation to this matter.
"If only 4 of these accidents occurred at the fall from the ceiling, it is 4 for a lot!"
It should not be up to someone other than those that even take such chances aa CRUCIAL.
Accidents happen, but should not happen såklart. If you do not even allowed to make mistakes so you never learn. I'm pretty sure that if one falls from the roof, so will the rest of the gang including Avhopperen be saved for security in the future. We need simply to be allowed to do little wrong, even in some places, that is what we learn from, and it strengthens the body and soul.
What comes to asbestos, however, I fully agree, this is untenable! This goes beyond the others items. myself and then speak other bowls - I have not specifically asked to be exposed to asbestos.
"We need simply to be allowed to do little wrong, even in some places, that is what we learn from, and it strengthens the body and soul."
Completely agree! But if the error is so gross that it should be better known, and there also are guidelines regarding security so it is unnecessary to have to tell someone that the shortcuts are not as good idea .. It is not a failure Monday of a teacher, but a failure of the door Monday. And the error can be desevrre not do again no ...
Note that it is not only against themselves should be protected, but the community should also be protected from you.
One thing is that it can land on someone when they tumble, if they do not die, they will be helsevesnet and our tax money to last over time, long time, it will not do it.
Family and friends of those who damage themselves and die, would be hurt, maybe some children are without fathers, etc. I do not want it. And one thing is what you do in your free time, something else is what you do on the job, then you should follow the regulations, the employer sets (as long as the employer's regulations do not contradict legislation). Otherwise it may go beyond your employer ...
There is also a security against employers who put pressure on workers to do things that are dangerous to their health. tydeligat blogs here have never been in a permanent job because he does not understand it.
I even slipped down from my own ståltak in late summer. There was dew wet, and I would just do a little work closely on pipa. When I was down grip slipped, and I slipped down quite slowly. It was not any chance to get stopped, even if I tried to get the only thing that stuck: the mounting screws. The bar utfor edge, but fortunately it is only 1.5 meters down to the ground at this location. I landed on the legs without a scar, but what if it was 10 feet down? My roof has only 28-degree fall, and I think it seems like the roof of the image is sharper.
Remember that even if it goes really slow down, it is almost impossible to get stopped when a first started to slip.
Now I ensure me with rope anyway.
NOK again proving an incredible ability to lack understanding of what actually takes place.
If you are stupid NOK to fall from your own roof, then you must like to do it, the care to the extent that no other.
Are you employed somewhere, the issue quite differently. Then take such things as the employer's liability, insurance, etc. into. It is NOK examples of foreign workers obtained in because they do not take security so heavily, and this is a pioneering concept well. Poles who have known no families, and do not leave them any if they forulykker.
Sure you have not fallen down before, and turned your head?