Puddinger!
Dagbladet able today to make a kjempesak in size murders and other scandals over a kristiansand company has been a little bolder in their jobs. We will see some "dramatic" pictures of 2 men who work seemingly unaffected by the seemingly lethal workplace.
Have we been puddinger?
It must be allowed to ask whether we are about to go into a pudding society, where no one is allowed to do anything without getting any help tredd down huet. I've already been with me the trend in the U.S. with the help of the head when the kids climb in trees ... In the example taken up in Dabladet there are those employees who are putting themselves up for the fare, and so seen searching for Darwin awards. Why can not even consider their own work, whether it is concerned with securing them may actually require it or terminate the job.
How often is it really wrong when you go on a roof? Those people do not fall down from the roof, and people are often on the roof!
Work in the tender? Who pays for security?
As a self-employed, I am familiar with the price and demand. It is clear that stricter rules for security leads to higher costs and things take tengre time. This means that the final bill for the purchase is dyere. So then comes the question of claim, the contractor for the job, we see pictures from, it took them more tender? If it took the number of bids, this was a typical tender reasonable one that does not give room for security? It is clear to cut down on security and preparations will save many hours, and many hours can be distorted reasonable tender which gives you the job.
HSE is good, but some of us should be allowed to this from the ceiling and to - when you choose to take this chance! Let us be allowed to learn from their own stupid mistakes, the only way to learn anyway! We have only good to beat us a little now and then!
Leave a Reply