Bomb!

January 15, 2009

Depending on how high you are in the criminal community, or what to call it. Maybe on the side of the law is a better word. So it is not uncommon that we find weapons or other things that are threatening to ordinary people.

m107-usarmy-image05 It is not always things are bought in to be used, although one can imagine såklart question when you sit on a Barrett M82A1. Believe that some of the "industry" appreciate this type klenodier. But maybe can even be set into the question whether to sharpen the procedures for arms control rather than drugs, because it obviously is not very difficult to get possession of this type of impact.

"When police went to the Romerike action against a property in Lillestrøm looking for drugs, they did a far more worrying finding."

I found it is disturbing that the police initially are looking for drugs, but then on coincidence to find them this penisforlengeren! Thus, in itself not so disturbing, but the weight of the weapon as it made in the media, one would have them had been on a roof tanks. We are back to how many such powder keg that is ready in 1000 it home without anyone actually cord. I want to believe that there must be many more such, because it was such a surprise for the police.

There is now no matter an unusually poor consolation that us normal mortals do not have anything to fear for such muskets pound, but I may well go with that vidunderet was not intended to rob the nearest Narvesen.

Anyway, good catch - but really - the bomb?

13 Responses to "bombing!"

  1. Not quite with you here? Are you aware of how difficult it is to obtain such weapons? Can promise you that there are not many of these in the thousands of home!
    Application may be such as to stop the armored pengetransport ... New NOKAS robbery? etc etc ...

    Regardless, it is a massive bomb to find such weapons.

  2. The crest is actually a sinister one tank. A velplasert shots from this bastard is NOK to stop a tank or kill someone on the other side of a 1m thick wall without that you can see where the shoots come from.
    How many may be in Norway is NOK get. 100-200 is legal in Norway.

  3. http://www.snipercentral.com/m82.htm
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yfVfRUXwXJc&feature=related

    I do not think Monday really can make how much a .50 BMG can do the damage.

  4. It is who has the weapon and not the weapon that matters.

    Barrett has some special qualities, but if you absolutely must go amok in the streets is NOK a shotgun at least as effective. Or a car in speed.

  5. Much idioti here. This weapon can not stop a tank. NOK hardly an armored personellkjøretøy. This is "only" a 12.7 mm gun. They decided not to use such weapons as anti-tank weapons at the beginning of World War II. Should you open a pengetransport get you at least as far to threaten the guards to open, or use a small explosive charge on the lock.

    It is, of course, worrying that the police find such an unusual weapon in crime, but it said that criminals can do much more mischief with an attack rifle than this weapon. Shots rate is low like that of any hunting rifle. If I were faced a criminal with a gun in hand, so I had seen that he had a Barret 50 attacks than a rifle or maskinpistol.

    Unusual events do better in the tabloid press than usual.

  6. Such a rifle can be with the "advantage" is used to commit an assassination attempt on the items. a politician. Terrorists may be 2 km away from the items. Jens Stoltenberg, and kill him without the PST had been able to stop this.

    That is what is anymore.

  7. What if he deserved it? Have you heard of the water should privatiseres? be ready for the ears and dollars pr.Liter tap water!

    Run to the Bilderberg, Stoltenberg .... Globaliseringens pawn

  8. This weapon is a bomb. The authorities in the United States has made it illegal to sell this weapon because of the potential for there to be shot at aircraft that take off at airports. That it was sold at all is another matter. The utilization of this weapon is incredible.

    Are you struck by this weapon is guaranteed to lose a limb or even die.

    But I wonder how they obtained this riflen. If he has stolen this from a transporting he worked in the investigation has been extremely poor.

  9. To the article author: I understand you right that you believe we should have strict arms in this country? Weapons policy here is designed by the Gestapo and enforced by the KGB! Anyway, this weapon is already illegal, what would it be to achieve even more restrictions?

    To Taffelost: You are right to say that such a patron is not necessary to open a pengetransport. To stop it, however, such a rifle unprecedented. In Sweden, criminals with great success used armor protection rockets at the same purpose, and as such submitted this gun the same niche. Moreover, what if they use anything like that during the next NOKAS-ran to stop the police and the like? That said, I agree with you that all of the AG3-MP5-one and one that is lost, both individually and combined pose a greater threat - the _er_, many of the thousands of home!

    To Attentat: Yes, it can be. So what? If a guy with a hunting rifle would like to plaffe down Jensemann while he keeps 1 May-speech, he will probably succeed. Threats against politicians is low, therefore they also have relatively little protection in this area. Toward stalkere and phone terrorists have, however, they do need more protection. And let us then assume that a sick bastard kill the prime minister: kjipt for family, country sorg a day or two, and Jonas takes over as head of the country until a new is selected. Business as usual before the lid on the coffin is nailed again. Norway is so stable that the loss of a toppolitiker neither cause power vacuum or folk riots. It is, amongst other things, a scenario with low probability and small consequences, that is nothing to worry about.

    To the Max Manus: Hæh? Thought has been patchy and things poorly formulated. Is there anything in this duren you think?

    "Jens Stoltenberg, Norway's prime minister, is personally responsible for the globalization stage in Norway. Because of Stoltenberg is the kingdom's water services to be privatized, and a result of this is that water is more expensive. This he has done on behalf of the Bilderberger Group, and he can only hope that they will protect him as his loyal vassals. For their global-style crimes, he deserves to be plaffet down with steroidal millitærvåpen treated. "

    Then, start to smoke hashish, the rower certain nerves.

  10. It is NOK more here who have not shot with 12.7
    I was quite shocked over the damage I caused by some rounds of the weapon.
    But it is the most fun weapon I've shot with.
    Even at 1000 meters distance and sharply sidevind I had _ingen_ problems with placing the shoots within 50 cm for innskyting.
    AT notorious bandits obtain such a thing is frightening. Especially since the Eastern European and Russian mafia innvaderer country.
    Mixing the tanks here are for toskete. A thought can not be hidden, but can this weapon.

  11. This is an illustration that stricter gun laws do not have any impact on those who are outside the law. It's easy to get everything from pistols and automatic and heavy firepower may also be obtained-all without having to submit søknag and prove their needs.
    Where are the statistics to document the losses of legal weapons? Divided into the various types of weapons? I do not want POD such statistics since svinnet is very low, and thus goes against POD's desire to choke the legal weapons.
    With the new regulation, POD takes over the job of the Parliament and the court chairs, the stock Regulations, it is ankeistans and create their own limitations and they get away with it. Where is democracy and parlamentarismen here?

  12. Tøv bullshit this spring to be able to build themselves up to i2007 spesiel without some form of permission.

  13. Is there really anyone here that has bearing on the weapon?

    Barrett developed the weapon to the original sport shooting (long shooting over 1km). It was a weapon that was developed to private individuals. But so did milliseconds tæret fancy weapon and it is now mainly a millisecond tært weapons. Yet, in all states in the U.S. (with the exception of Arnold who made the weapon is prohibited in California) you can buy this weapon, as a private person. No biggie. Get over it.

Leave a Reply